info@bajajlaw.com
(619) 525-7005
In brief: You do not have to give police or federal agents a statement. The Fifth Amendment says no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” and under Miranda v. Arizona a person in custody must be warned of the right to remain silent and to have a lawyer present. But you usually have to say clearly that you are using those rights. Talk with a lawyer before you answer questions.
This page explains what the law says about statements in a criminal investigation, why the right to silence must usually be invoked out loud, how statements are used in court, the risks of false statements, and practical steps if detectives or agents contact you in Carlsbad or elsewhere in San Diego County. The rules come mainly from the Fifth Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona. For signs that you may already be a subject, see how to know if you are under investigation.
The right to remain silent
The Fifth Amendment provides that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court held that a person in custody “must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires.”
Miranda warnings apply to custodial interrogation. Many interviews happen at a home, a workplace or by phone, where the person is not in custody and no warnings are required (Miranda v. Arizona). Agents may say the conversation is voluntary. That is accurate, and it also means you can decline.
You usually have to invoke your rights clearly
Silence alone may not protect you. As the Court put it, the Fifth Amendment “does not establish an unqualified ‘right to remain silent.’” In Salinas v. Texas, a non-custodial interview, the Court said that although “no ritualistic formula is necessary in order to invoke the privilege,” a witness “does not do so by simply standing mute.” The prosecution was allowed to use the person’s silence in response to one question. In Berghuis v. Thompkins, the Court held that a suspect in custody must invoke the right to remain silent “unambiguously”; if the statement is “ambiguous or equivocal,” police are not required to stop.
A simple, clear statement works best: “I am going to remain silent, and I want to speak with a lawyer.” Then stop talking and do not restart the conversation. Under Miranda, “If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.”
Waiving your rights
Rights can be given up, which is why interviews often begin with a signed form. Miranda allows a waiver only if it “is made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently,” and it adds that if a person “indicates in any manner and at any stage of the process that he wishes to consult with an attorney before speaking there can be no questioning” (Miranda v. Arizona). Agreeing to talk at the start does not prevent you from stopping later. Whether a waiver was valid is often litigated in a motion to suppress, but it is far better not to waive in the first place.
How statements are used in court
In California, a defendant’s own statement “is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered against the declarant in an action to which he is a party” (Evidence Code 1220). That means anything you say, including partial explanations or casual remarks, can be offered by the prosecution. Statements are often compared later with phone records, video and other witnesses, and small inconsistencies can be presented as evidence of guilt.
The risk of false statements
Lying is a separate crime. Federal law makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully make “any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation” in a matter within federal jurisdiction (18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)), including statements to FBI or other federal agents in an informal interview. In California, falsely reporting to police that a crime was committed, “knowing the report to be false,” is a misdemeanor (Penal Code 148.5(a)). Declining to answer is lawful; giving a false answer is not.
The right to a lawyer
Under Miranda, a person in custody has the right to have a lawyer present during questioning. Once formal charges are filed, the Sixth Amendment guarantees the accused “the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” Before charges, there is no right to an appointed lawyer, but you can hire one and decline to be interviewed until your lawyer is involved.
Searches, phones and other requests
Investigators often ask for consent to search a phone, car or home. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, and you may decline consent; if agents have a warrant, do not physically resist, but you do not have to answer questions while it is carried out. A grand jury subpoena is different: it is a court process that must be answered, often through a lawyer (see what a subpoena is).
Practical steps if you are contacted
- Get the officer’s name, agency and contact information, and say your lawyer will be in touch. Being polite is not a waiver; under Miranda a waiver must be made “voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently.”
- Invoke clearly. Say you are remaining silent and want a lawyer, as Berghuis and Salinas require.
- Do not try to explain or apologize. Any statement can be offered against you (Evidence Code 1220).
- Never give false information. See 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and Penal Code 148.5.
- Do not delete messages or files. Destroying records for an official proceeding can be charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c).
Talk with the office before you give a statement
If detectives or agents want to interview you, contact the office to talk with Vikas Bajaj, or call (619) 525-7005.
This page is attorney advertising and general information, not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts.